The origin of ‘Confirmation’

A short text about so-called confirmation (it is a few teaching notes, but since someone asked for it I published it anyway):

Confirmation–the Baptism of the Holy Spirit

Baptism of the Holy Spirit was early established as a necessary step in early Christianity. Later this became so-called confirmation, in the Orthodox Church ‘chrismation’. Already in early Christianity anointing with oil was used, and is so in many of the old churches. As noted, in early Christianity the combination baptism, Eucharist and ‘confirmation’ belonged together.

What is ‘confirmation’? In Lutheran tradition it has become a course in the Christian faith, finished through a solemn service. But the background is thoroughly ‘charismatic’: Acts 8:14–17

Now when the apostles at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent to them Peter and John, who came down and prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit; for it had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid their hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit.

This text is the background for what later was called confirmation:

  • The apostles themselves came ‘down’ (since Jerusalem is always regarded ‘up’)
  • They laid hands on the converts
  • They received the Holy Spirit

What is the point with saying this?

  • This was so important that the apostles themselves came to pray!
  • The baptism in water was not considered enough: each believer needed to be baptised in the Holy Spirit
  • This is evidence that conversion/baptism is one thing and the gift of the Spirit another thing
  • In the oldest churches there are rituals, which preserve this doubleness: receiving Jesus/baptism and being filled with the Holy Spirit. Acts 8:14–17 is read even at a Roman-Catholic confirmation!

In Lutheranism this has been lost due to a concentration on the learning aspect. But originally this has nothing with learning to do.

Other ways of describing this is the ‘down-payment’, arrabōn, and the seal, sfragis, of the Holy Spirit, who is a foretaste of the life in heaven:

2 Cor 1:22 and has both anointed us and marked us with his seal, giving us as pledge the Spirit in our hearts.

2 Cor 5:5 It is God who designed us for this very purpose, and he has given us the Spirit as a pledge.

Eph 1:13–14 In him you also, who have heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and have believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, who is the pledge of our inheritance, for the freedom of the people whom God has taken for his own, for the praise of his glory

Hebrews is talking about: “the teaching about baptisms and the laying-on of hands, about the resurrection of the dead and eternal judgement (Heb 6:2),” probably about baptism in water, baptism in the Holy Spirit, the only two that are clearly spoken of in early Christianity.

The gift of the Holy Spirit as a separate gift is a necessary part of Apostolic Christianity and just as churches observe baptism, they should consider how they do to convey the Holy Spirit into the life of every convert.

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

6 thoughts on “The origin of ‘Confirmation’

  1. Pingback: Andens dop och konfirmationen. - Bengts Blogg

  2. Tack, Anders, för detta inlägg.
    Som du vet motsvaras konfirmationen i ortodox tradition av den heliga myronmörjelsens sakrament (chrisma) (1 Joh 2:27), i direkt anslutning till dopets sakrament. Detta – menar vi – är Andedopet. Själva myronsmörjelsen föregås av att prästen eller biskopen andas på den nydöpte med orden “Ta emot den Helige Ande”.
    Handpåläggning med bön om den Helige Andes bistånd sker vid prästvigningens sakrament.
    Enligt ortodox tradition utgår alltså den Helige Ande av evighet från Fadern. Den Helige Ande som gåva skänkes vid myronsmörjelsen. Den Helige Ande kan också sändas av Sonen, såsom skedde vid den stora Pingstdagen, och som fortfarande sker vid de olika sakramenten. Enligt ortodox tradition är det alltså skillnad på Andens utgående (av evighet) och Andens sändande (i tiden).
    Per, tjänare i Koptisk-ortodoxa kyrkan.

  3. Dear Dr. Gerdmar,

    I am a research student at London School of Theology working on Christian initiation in Luke-Acts. I am currently wrestling with how Luke is using δίδοται in Acts 8:18. Is it that Simon saw an event, that the Spirit “was given,” or that Simon saw a principle, through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Spirit “is given”? I know that this is a construction involving a verb of perception, hoti and a present tense verb in a dependent clause. But, is the determining factor primarily grammmar or context?

    Any thoughts you might have would be greatly appreciated!

    In Christ,

    David

    ἰδὼν δὲ ὁ Σίμων ὅτι διὰ τῆς ἐπιθέσεως τῶν χειρῶν τῶν ἀποστόλων δίδοται τὸ πνεῦμα, προσήνεγκεν αὐτοῖς χρήματα (Act 8:18)

  4. Dear David,
    My spontaneous reading of the text is more contextual. Simon sees real power and wonders how he can get hold of it… I don’t think this involves any deeper reflection. He is isn the power business, and has seen something greater than he has experienced before. The nice this is that Simon’s reaction shows that there really were manifestations of the Holy Spirit when he was given…
    Best,
    Anders

  5. Dear Anders,

    Thank you for your answer. I do agree with you that he saw a power and wanted it for himself. That is what I meant by “principle”. Simon saw immediately that the apostles had this power to impart the Spirit through their hands and I again agree with you that it had to have been some visible manifestation that caused him to recognize this.

    Wishing you all the best,

    David

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *